Body Fat Percentage Calculator

Estimate body fat percentage with either US Navy circumference or BMI (Deurenberg), switch units instantly, and view optional fat and lean mass. This tool is informational only.

No sign-in. Your inputs stay in your browser.

Other languages ja | en | zh-CN | zh-TW | zh-HK | es | es-419 | es-MX | pt-BR | pt-PT | id | vi | ko | fr | de | it | ru-RU | hi-IN | ar | bn-BD | ur-PK | tr-TR | th-TH | pl-PL | fil-PH | ms-MY | fa-IR | nl-NL | he-IL | cs-CZ

Enter your measurements

Keep the unit system consistent for every field. US Navy requires neck and waist (plus hip for women). BMI (Deurenberg) requires weight.

Unit system
Sex
Whole years, typically 13–80.
Standing height without shoes.
Optional for US Navy; required for BMI.
Measure just below the larynx, tape level and snug.
Measure horizontally at the narrowest waist point.
Measure around the fullest part of the hips and glutes.
Relax, breathe out gently, and keep the tape parallel to the floor for every circumference.

Results

Enter your measurements and choose a method to estimate body fat percentage.

Body fat percentage

Category

For information only; measurement methods and individual factors vary. Not a medical diagnosis.

Measurement guide

US Navy and BMI formulas estimate population averages. Muscle mass, body shape, hydration, and ethnicity can shift results.

Interpretation (and an example)

Mini example

If you weigh 80 kg and your estimate is 20%, fat mass is about 16 kg and lean mass about 64 kg. Use this to track trends over time rather than a single “true” value.

Tips to reduce measurement noise

References

How to use this page effectively

This guide helps you use Body Fat Percentage Calculator as a practical decision page: start with the key section, confirm assumptions, and use related links to move from overview to the exact tool or topic you need.

How it works

This page is designed as an orientation layer. It summarizes a topic, highlights the most common decision paths, and links to task-specific tools or deeper references. The best workflow is to read the short context first, choose one concrete objective, and then follow a single linked action path. By avoiding parallel jumps across many links, you reduce context switching and make results easier to reproduce.

When to use

Use this page when you are not yet sure which calculator or resource is the right fit, or when you need a quick map of related options before doing detailed calculations. It is particularly useful at the start of a task, during review meetings, and when onboarding teammates who need a clear sequence rather than isolated links.

Common mistakes to avoid

Interpretation and worked example

A reliable pattern is: pick one objective, open one recommended link, run a baseline case, then return and choose only one follow-up branch. If your second branch gives a conflicting direction, go back to this page and compare assumptions (units, period, constraints) before deciding. This keeps decisions traceable and avoids hidden mismatches across pages.

See also

FAQ

Which formulas does the body fat calculator use?

Choose the US Navy circumference method or the BMI-based Deurenberg equation. Both accept metric or US customary measurements and clip results to 0–75 %.

Is this body fat estimate medical advice?

No. These methods provide estimates only. Discuss health or training decisions with a clinician, registered dietitian, or certified coach.

What should I do first on this page?

Start with the minimum required inputs or the first action shown near the primary button. Keep optional settings at defaults for a baseline run, then change one setting at a time so you can explain what caused each output change.

Why does this page differ from another tool?

Different pages often use different defaults, units, rounding rules, or assumptions. Align those settings before comparing outputs. If differences remain, compare each intermediate step rather than only the final number.

How reliable are the displayed values?

Values are computed in the browser and rounded for display. They are good for planning and educational checks, but for regulated or high-stakes decisions you should validate assumptions with official guidance or professional review.

Related calculators