Example preset
Choose a preset to fill the form and refresh results and charts instantly.
Inputs
Results
| P wave running time | — |
|---|---|
| Omori coefficient k (this Vp/Vs conversion) | — |
| S wave running time | — |
| Occurrence time (P standard) | — |
| Occurrence time (S standard) | — |
| Difference in time of occurrence | — |
Graph (distance - running time)
Once entered, the travel time curve will be displayed.
How it's calculated
Assuming constant speed (Vp, Vs), the running time is tP = D / Vp、tS = D / Vs It is.
S-P = Δt = tS - tP Therefore, the epicenter distance D is calculated using the following formula.
D = Δt / (1/Vs - 1/Vp) = Δt × Vp × Vs / (Vp - Vs)
In school materials D = k × (S-P)(Omori official)k = Vp × Vs / (Vp - Vs) is the Omori coefficient.
In arrival time mode,T0 = Tp - D/Vp(P standard) and T0 = Ts - D/VsEstimate the time of occurrence from (S standard).
Attention:This tool is an approximation for learning and does not take into account depth dependence of velocity, crustal structure, or path differences.
How to use this calculator effectively
This guide helps you use Calculate epicenter distance and occurrence time from P waves and S waves (initial tremors) (for education) in a repeatable way: define a baseline, change one variable at a time, and interpret outputs with explicit assumptions before you share or act on results.
How it works
The page applies deterministic logic to your inputs and shows rounded output for readability. Treat it as a comparison workflow: run one baseline case, adjust a single parameter, and measure both absolute and percentage deltas. If a result seems off, verify units, time basis, and sign conventions before drawing conclusions. This approach keeps your analysis reproducible across teammates and sessions.
When to use
Use this page when you need a fast estimate, a classroom check, or a practical what-if comparison. It works best for planning and prioritization steps where you need direction and magnitude quickly before investing in deeper modeling, manual spreadsheets, or formal external review.
Common mistakes to avoid
- Changing multiple parameters at once, which hides the true cause of output movement.
- Mixing units (percent vs decimal, monthly vs yearly, gross vs net) across scenarios.
- Comparing with another tool without aligning defaults, constants, and rounding rules.
- Using rounded display values as exact downstream inputs without re-checking precision.
Interpretation and worked example
Run a baseline scenario and keep that result visible. Next, modify one assumption to reflect your realistic alternative and compare direction plus size of change. If the direction matches your domain expectation and the size is plausible, your setup is usually coherent. If not, check hidden defaults, boundary conditions, and interpretation notes before deciding which scenario to adopt.
See also
FAQ
What is the initial tremor duration (S-P)?
This is the time difference between the arrival of P waves and the arrival of S waves. In general, the farther from the epicenter the longer S-P will be.
Are epicenter distance and epicenter distance the same?
Strictly speaking, it's different. This tool is an educational approximation that uses a simple model with a constant speed to estimate the epicenter distance.
How high should I set Vp and Vs?
Typical values are used in textbooks, but they vary depending on region and depth. Please give priority to the values specified in classes and materials.
What should I do if the S wave arrival time is smaller than the P wave?
If you want to cross dates, turn on "S wave the next day". Please also check the time as there may be a typo.
Can this result be used for disaster prevention decisions?
Cannot be used. This tool is an approximation for learning and educational purposes. Please refer to information from public institutions for actual judgment.
How to use Calculate epicenter distance and occurrence time from P waves and S waves (initial tremors) (for education) effectively
What this calculator does
This page is for estimating outcomes by changing inputs in one controlled workflow. The model keeps your focus on variables, not output shape. Start with stable assumptions, then test sensitivity by changing one key input at a time to observe directional impact.
Input meaning and unit policy
Each input has an expected unit and a typical range. For reliable interpretation, check whether you are using the same unit system, period, and base assumptions across all runs. Unit mismatch is the most common source of unexpected drift in numeric results.
Use-case sequence
A practical sequence is: first run with defaults, then create a baseline log, then run one alternative scenario, and finally compare only the changed output metric. This sequence reduces cognitive load and prevents false pattern recognition in early experiments.
Common mistakes to avoid
Avoid changing too many variables at once, mixing incompatible data sources, and interpreting a one-time output without checking robustness. A single contradictory input can flip conclusions, so keep each experiment minimal and document assumptions as part of your note.
Interpretation guidance
Review both magnitude and direction. Direction tells you whether a strategy moves outcomes in the desired direction, while magnitude helps you judge practicality. If both agree, you can proceed; if not, rebuild the baseline and verify constraints before deciding.
Related tools
- Geology/Environment (Disaster prevention (earthquake/tsunami/ground))
- Earthquake magnitude and energy comparison calculator
- Moment magnitude Mw (Fault → Mo → Mw) (ES-015)
- Earthquake catalog → Gutenberg–Richter (b-value estimation) (ES-024)
- Ground: Simple indicator of liquefaction (for educational use) (ES-025)
Comments
Comments are only loaded on request (Giscus).